Process Modeling: Putting To Print Things That Work
February 2, 2009 by Brian J. Ritchey · Leave a Comment
For most firms, knowing what needs to be done to effectively manage a case is something learned through time and experience. Unfortunately, this valuable information is rarely put to print for others to follow. The result is constant “reinvention of the wheel”. For associates, how well you can swim after being thrown in the shark-infested pool determines whether you become partner, career associate or looking for other work.
Likewise, if there is staff turnover, how quickly they are up to speed on your processes will determine how long it takes for productivity to reach or exceed pre-turnover levels.
Modeling your processes provide a concrete method for everyone in the firm to know not only what is expected, but why the expectation is in place and how to go about performing the task(s) in a manner approved by the firm. This has several benefits, not the least of which is a reduction in the “change curve” time, improved efficiency and the increased capacity to scale.
There is, of course, a process to building the process model. The first step is to outline all of the processes in the firm. This includes administrative processes, practice-related processes, client and matter-related processes, and any other process that pertains to firm business.
Once outlined, those who have the experience must brainstorm and put to print all the years of experience that has taught them to know on instinct what to do as the work-flow meanders from question to question. Mapping this visually helps to find the gaps and gives you the opportunity to take out redundant tasks which may cause bottlenecks that reduce efficiency.
The example to the left is a mapping of a collections process (click on it to view in full screen). It started with just picking a point in the process, going through the steps, then reading and re-reading to fill in the gaps and add in the details.
Once you have the process visually mapped, the next step is taking each step and reviewing why it is there. The “why” helps to confirm that the step is necessary – if you can’t figure out why a step is needed, then it isn’t needed. The “why” is also for new employees or others who may have to temporarily perform the task later. One of the complaints I often hear from partners has to do with the lack of “ownership” some in their firm have towards files given to them. In my opinion, a lack of understanding the entirety of the file is one reason an associate may do subpar work. Thus, part of the process of taking a file from a partner should include a thorough reading of the file, paying particular note of certain things the partner always looks for to help understand the important issues in the file. Although this is obvious to those with experience, it may not come as second nature to new associates or staff. The “why” helps them see it from the partner’s perspective without forcing the partner to lose productive time in having to explain it.
This has more than one benefit. Although highly unlikely (tic)¹, it may be that the partner’s time tested process may miss out on a detail or two that an enterprising associate or support staff discovers. In cases such as this, having the “why” helps the associate or support staff understand the purpose and he/she then can propose process enhancement, furthering continuous process improvement². (This can be encouraged through upward reviews).
After providing the “why”, the next part is the “how”. Use a step-by-step approach so that others can follow the process in an easy-to-understand manner. An example approach for a collections process would be:
- Sort AR for collectible and non-collectible accounts;
- Distribute to responsible attorneys to determine if any should be held from normal process;
- Determine age of oldest unpaid invoice;
- If older than:
- 30 days – go here
- 45 days – go here
- 60 days – go here
- etc
- etc
After completing this tedious but necessary list, model it visually through a tool like Microsoft’s Visio. An example output for a part of the above process might look like this:
After review of the processes to ensure they are appropriate and are easy for others to understand, make it easily available for your staff to access. In today’s connected world, this means access through a web browser. Your site should be easy to access from within the network and should be easy to navigate. An example site may look like the below (shown without theme – in practice it may mimic your external website’s design):

Besides the benefits discussed above for modeling your firm’s processes, there are quantifiable reasons as well that can lead directly to the firm’s bottom line. For example, you can assign an amount of time it should take to perform a certain task. Having this information available allows you to set baselines for performance reviews (efficiency of employee versus the firm efficiency standard). It also gives the firm an opportunity to offer different billing options to clients; for example, if a client desires more cost certainty, the firm can offer a flat rate based on how long it takes to perform the tasks in a typical case, taking into consideration the facts and the potential to vary from the norm. You can then add your margin to this number to provide a fee that is both acceptable to the client and ensures profitability for the firm.
As you can probably note from reading the above, modeling your processes is a tedious and time-consuming process in itself. However, the benefits of taking the time to map, model and follow your processes shouldn’t be understated. Not only will it improve the manner in which work is performed, but it can bring measurable benefits to your bottom line.
Of Counsel Consulting can help your firm map, model and price your processes so that you attain maximum benefit for taking the time to further the goal of continuous improvement. Please feel free to call or email us for more information.
______________________________________
¹ tongue in cheek – Go Back
² The idea of continuous process improvement isn’t new but is laid out nicely in a book written by Tom Pryor called Using Activity Based Management For Continuous Improvement that I recommend. – Go Back
False Sense Of Security Still Prevalent Among Law Firms
December 15, 2008 by Brian J. Ritchey · Leave a Comment
In spite of overwhelming evidence that the booming economy enjoyed practically uninterrupted for the past 20 years has ended, at least for the near term, many law firms are still optimistic of their 2009 prospects. I beg to differ. I believe 2009 will start a strong shift in the make-up of many law firms due to the lack of any planning for the economic conditions.
Who can blame attorneys for being optimistic? Regardless of the economy since at least the early 1980′s, lawyers have enjoyed consistently increased business and profits. This has led to a complacency and a denial of the economic conditions that are facing the country.
Law firms aren’t alone. In fact, the “big three” auto makers (Ford perhaps excepted) are acting out of a similar denial as they attempt to scare Congress and the President into paying for their internal problems. Who didn’t see the failure of GM coming? Was no one noticing the extravagant pensions being offered to the employees? Did anyone who dared notice believe the ever slimming margins would cover the ever growing benefits? Not likely. As the Legislative and Executive branches delve deeper into the phantom pockets of our tax base, a nice summary of the fallacy of “avoiding acting like Herbert Hoover” has been inked in an opinion piece by Todd J. Zywicki in the Wall Street Journal.
Law firms, though not nearly in the long-term slide as the domestic auto industry, is more sensitive to this economic downturn than many attorneys would like to admit. Many firms have been spoiled by margins that exceed 50% without spending more than a passing glance at the indicators that led them to such bounty. The issue isn’t so much a drop-off in business, though some firms who specialize in areas that are in the midst of collapse will certainly feel the pain. Rather, the issue is how firms will retain good talent, retain their expected incomes and avoid layoffs of associates.
These are regular issues for most industries but are foreign to the mid-size law firm. Many firms pride themselves in their “family” atmosphere, which includes the bratty sibling rivalries that are tolerated when times are good. Salary incongruousness may seem a bothersome itch when profits are high, but once the deadwood becomes heavy the scratching becomes intolerable. Some may panic to find their balance sheet showing a loss without ever seeing it coming. Drastic change is put into place – at a time no worse to prepare. No more is it wise to visit a market when hungry than to suggest change while in the midst of a spiral.
Yet our economy has afforded all of us time to prepare. It was suggested by many (myself included as far back as March) that our economy was in for some hard times. Firms with the foresight and gumption to plan and hold timekeepers accountable for providing not only quality service to their clients but ensuring prompt billing and payment for the betterment of the long term financial health of the firm are in a position now to profit over the firms who were complacent.
It’s not too late, however. Many firms are just now seeing the first bumps in the road. It is my opinion that the economic downturn is just now really beginning to hit middle America. The massive layoffs (over 533,000 in November) are an indicator that the many months of body blows caused by the collapse of the credit and housing markets (not so unlike what happened in the late 1920′s, speaking of Herbert Hoover) are finally taking its toll. The question now is, where is the bottom?
No one knows. That is a troubling concern that should make you want to hug every dollar your firm receives and not let go of it. In times such as these, power goes to those who hold cash. This may change if our government attempts to over-spend its way out of our economic downturn (thereby devaluing the dollar, leading possibly to hyperinflation combined with stagnant productivity – a prescription for the “d” word), but as of right now, many believe that the economy should rebound sometime in 2010.
In my opinion, firms need to pay more attention to the profitability of each fee earner and place more emphasis on marketing activities and their key profit drivers. Please feel free to email me (by clicking here) if you would like some ideas on how to not only retain your current income, but increase profits during an economic downturn.
Google Browser Signals End of “Mandated” Operating System
September 2, 2008 by Brian J. Ritchey · Leave a Comment
Google is set to release on Wednesday a first public “beta” of a web browser that at first glance appears to join a suddenly crowded web browser marketplace. After reading its “comic” explaining the idea behind the browser, it becomes apparent that Google isn’t just trying to enter the web browser market – it is trying to transform the web browser into a vehicle for stable, web-based application delivery.
As explained in the comic, traditional browsers can crash pretty easily when delivering web applications. This is due to the framework of the web browser. It was initially developed to do small tasks such as render text and graphics quickly. As browsers grew, they added tools for email and calendaring that were fine for individuals, but added bulk and instability for those who wanted to use browsers to push internal applications.
Google has responded by placing each tab of the browser in its own process (ie, each tab is like opening a new instance of the browser) so that if one tab becomes unstable, it doesn’t affect the other tabs. This also prevents a script that is slowing down the rendering of a page to affect the other tabs.
This comes with a cost – additional overhead (more RAM memory, better hardware). But for business use, this can finally usher in the end of executable-based client server applications and push all business applications through your browser. This will not only simplify administration of applications from an IT perspective, it gives freedom to end users to choose whatever operating system they want to use (which may end up increasing IT administration, so that may be a wash – IT isn’t going to be less of a need in the future in any event).
Perhaps this is what will challenge virtualization (something Microsoft envisions as it prepares for the end of Windows).
The above is merely scratching the surface of the new features of Google Chrome. The browser will be open-source, meaning developers around the world will be free to see, use, and improve upon the source code (and create their own applications based on the technology without paying licensing fees). It also tries to improve upon the user experience that takes advantage of Google’s omnipresence on the internet. Read the comic by clicking here to see more of what Google envisions with its browser.
The bottom line is that computing as we know it will soon be a thing of the past. New technologies that are in their infancy now will be in the forefront of your technology decisions soon. Make sure your IT department is testing these technologies now so they can give you a better opinion on which to choose when the time comes.
UPDATE: As if on cue: ”Google believes any task done in a standalone desktop computer application can be delivered via the Web and Chrome is its bet that software applications can be run via a browser.” Read more here.

